Quantcast willametteLive.com || Film tackles hazards of plastic

willamettelive.com - your source for news in the willamette valley
ADVERTISEMENT

   

Log-in | Signup (Free!)
Film tackles hazards of plastic
By Darren Pike
from WillametteLive, Section News
Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009 at 02:26:11 AM PDT

On March 12, Cindy Kimbell hosts a screening of “Addicted to Plastic” as part of the Salem Progressive Film Series along with guest speakers Angel White and David Allaway.

Filmmaker Ian Connacher woke up one day and realized that his whole life revolves around plastics. "Why is this," he asked himself. "How did it come to be?"

After two years of production, countless firsthand interviews and a trip around the planet, he created a documentary that seemed to pose just as many questions as it supplied answers.

The UN estimates that there are 46,000 pieces of plastic in every square mile of the ocean. This inconvenient estimate is completely supported in the film by Dr. Jan van Franeker of Holland who says that on his home island of Tessel, 20 to 28 lbs. of plastic garbage wash onto every mile of the shore everyday. While some of it comes from fishing vessels, 80 percent of it comes from land.

Because of the natural weather cycle of the Pacific ocean, all of the plastic garbage from Asia and North America drifts out into a small region of the pacific called a gyre or the Eastern Garbage Patch.

Connacher makes a quick stop in Brooks, Oregon to meet with Allen Youngsma of Agri-plas; one of Oregon’s largest recycling plants. Agri-plas processes over 18 million tons of plastic a year, about 15 percent of the states waste.

“I actually went out to the North Pacific Gyre to research the impact that plastic is having on microbes," said White, a research associate at OSU. "Our research didn’t turn up as much garbage as I had heard we would find, but that could be due to a number of reasons like maybe we never found the center or the weather spread the debris out too far."

Connacher claims that out of the 100 billion pounds of plastic U.S. citizens produce every year, we only end up recycling around five percent.

Fortunately, the film does offer some solutions to this ever growing problem.

Some companies are pioneering new and environmentally friendly ways to locally dispose of our “plastic problems.“

Some plastic producers have turned to using plastic materials made from corn that break down much easier than their fossil fuel counterparts. But this seemingly simple solution concerns David Allaway from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.

“There are a few areas where I think the film is a little misleading," he said. My largest concerns are the overwhelmingly positive light given to bio-plastics and degradable plastics. They are promoted in the film as essentially harmless. Bio-plastics and degradable plastics may offer some potential, but they also pose some challenges that conventional plastics don’t.”




and ... ??? (#1)
by Anonymous on Sun Mar 01, 2009 at 05:55:20 PM PDT
why does the article stop here? What challenges do bioplastics pose that conventional plastics don't? Please specify. Thx. There are significantly more advantages over conventional plastics than challenges. Keywords (not only biodegradability) but also: limited crude oil resources, climate change, extended shelf life for vegetables etc etc. Of course bioplastics cannot be used for all kinds of applications. But surely for many packaging applications which today end up in the oceans. However, education is the number one topic. Plastic MUST NOT END UP IN THE OCEAN, no matter what it is made of.

Alernative to Bio-plastics and Petro-plastics (#2)
by Anonymous on Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 12:31:54 AM PDT
I saw the film and agree that there is too much emphasis on bio-plastics as the solution and not enough on lowering consumption. Cutting our dependence on single-use disposable products and packaging in the first place should be prioritized over the wholesale switch to bio-plastics. Getting into the habit of bringing our own bags, bottles, and other containers is a good start. Switching to durable glass and stainless steel instead of plastic can help to conserve resources in the long run. I've compiled a long resource list of plastic-free changes I've made in my own life here: http://www.fakeplasticfish.com/thelist Beth Terry Oakland, CA

Leave No Plastic Behind (#3)
by Anonymous on Thu Mar 05, 2009 at 11:34:14 PM PDT
www.LNPB.org Join an artistic and practical movement to living plastic free. Call for Artists! Email us for more information. To (much less) plastic in the world, Think Ahead, Leave No Plastic Behind

degradable plastic (#4)
by Anonymous on Sat Mar 07, 2009 at 06:50:51 AM PDT
There is a big difference between the two types of biodegradable plastic. 1. Hydro-biodegradable or "compostable " or "bioplastics", made wholly or partly from crops, which biodegrade in a highly microbial environment, such as composting, and 2. Oxo-biodegradable plastics, made from a by-product of oil-refining, which degrade in the normal environment by a process of oxidation initiated by an additive, and then biodegrade after their molecular weight has reduced to the point where naturally-occurring micro-organisms can access the material. For dealing with the problm of ocean pollution,oxo-biodegradable is by far the best bet, and if all the plastic had been made oxo-biodegradable there would be no north Pacific garbage patch. This is done by including a formulation which breaks the molecular chains within the polymer and makes it degrade then biodegrade, on land or at sea, in the light or the dark, in heat or cold, in whatever timescale is required, leaving NO fragments NO methane and NO harmful residues. Oxo-bio can be tested according to American Standard 6954, and is certified safe for food-contact. It is made from a by-product of oil refining which used to be wasted, so nobody is importing extra oil to make it. It can be recycled, and made from recyclate, and there is little or no additional cost. By contrast,"compostable" plastics are much too expensive for everyday use, and there are very few composting facilities anyway. Also, as it is difficult to separate compostable plastics from other plastics, many industrial composters do not want plastic of any kind in their feedstock, and it is not suitable for home-composting. Compostable plastics damage the recycling process if they get into in a normal plastic recycling waste stream Plastics made from corn do NOT have a smaller carbon footprint than conventional plastics - consider the hydrocarbons burned by the machines which clear the land, plough and harrow the land, make the fertilisers and pesticides and bring them to the land, sow the seed, harvest the crop, take it to the factory, and run the autoclaves. Land and water resources should be used to grow food, not to make plastic. Also as they are thicker and heavier than normal plastic "compostable" plastic products need more trucks to transport them, using more diesel fuel, occupying more road space and emitting more CO2


 POST A COMMENT

Your opinion matters! This is your chance to add to the story and voice your opinion. Links are welcome and encouraged.

We also encourage you to register an account and to login prior to posting comments. However, this is not required to post a comment. If you are not logged in, the comment will be posted as "Anonymous."

Subject:

Comment:

Enter the two words below to prove that you are a legitimate user.

 RELATED LINKS
> Also by Darren Pike
 USER INFO

Login to post comments

Need an Account? Signup

Username:
Password:
 YOUR TURN
Most Comments: The Roxxy Moves Into Lefty's space in Salem

Latest Comment: What's in a name

Comments:
> How to get tickets? (Anonymous)
> Sonic Storm Tickets ? (Anonymous)
> Listen to criticism (Anonymous)
> Oh yes (Anonymous)
> Oregonians vs. Californians (Anonymous)
ADVERTISEMENT